Wednesday, March 19, 2008

The glam' world of advertising


P1020710.JPG
Originally uploaded by stevenjude
I'm sitting in a pre-production meeting talking about who would be the best people to put together animatics before we hire people to produce spots.

Animatics are a bizarre thing. You put together a piece of a cartoon that you whizz the camera over and then ask people to imagine what it would be like as a complete spot.

Of course people always think that you're suggesting an animated spot and reject whatever you've done based on the 'fact' that beer (or whatever) shouldn't be advertised in a style that is primarily suited to children.

It skews everything - but as the bias is built in to every spot then the baseline is set and you can get a bit of a read on how things work.

The cartoon boards and production time costs a fortune... but then shooting something with CGI and a real director costs a fortune, a kidney and a first born.

Somehow today feels less glam' than I'd imagined it would. But we're getting there.

3 comments:

  1. Anonymous5:09 AM

    Whatever happened to just having a good idea, trusting it and doing it?

    (extract from my new book 'MADVERTISING... or how to fall behind and lose friends in advertising...')

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous8:22 AM

    what happened was production and media inflation... when you're going to be spending upward of $100m you want somebody to show you a graph showing that it's going to work (probably)

    Testing is why the ads got crap, but it's also why they still work. Such is life.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous6:47 AM

    sounds like formula 1...

    ReplyDelete

Comments always welcome